Five ways to get honest feedback before you make a real decision, starting with one prompt and ending with a full council of advisers.
A Stanford team tested 11 leading AI models, Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini included, and found they backed users’ actions 49% more often than humans did, even when the question involved deception or harm. People who chatted with the flattering AI came away more sure they were right. And they still liked it better. (Science, 2026)
So before you bet money or time on what AI tells you, set it up to push back. Here are five ways, from simple to advanced.
01
Any AI: Stop putting the answer in your question
"Posting every day will help me grow, right?" already tells the AI what you want to hear. This prompt rewrites your question so it’s neutral, then gives you the strongest case for and against, and an honest call.
02
Any AI: Set a no yes-man rule in your project
Paste this into your project instructions once. Every chat in that project judges your ideas on their merits and holds its answer unless you bring new evidence, not just pushback.
03
Claude Skill: Devil’s Advocate
From OneWave AI. It argues the strongest honest case against your plan, ranks up to three objections, and runs a pre-mortem: "Assume it is 12 months later and this failed. Name the single most likely reason." It credits what you got right and ends with what would have to be true for your plan to work.
Say "play devil’s advocate," "poke holes in this" or "what am I missing." You can ask for gentle, standard or hard.
Free and open source under the MIT license. I packaged it as a ZIP so it uploads straight into Claude, with no changes to the skill.
04
Claude Skill: Critical Thinking
From Hieu Luu. It audits your plan, memo or draft and tags every problem with a quote from your text: [GAP] for missing evidence, [LEAP] when the evidence doesn’t support the conclusion, plus labels for assumptions, conflicts and opinions.
Heads up: it asks for your own take first, so you build your judgment too. Type "skip" if you just want the audit.
05
Claude Skill: My LLM Council
Five advisers look at your decision: the Contrarian, the First-Principles Thinker, the Expansionist, the Outsider and the Executor. Then they review each other’s answers blind, and a chairman gives you a final call plus your Monday-morning steps. It’s based on Andrej Karpathy’s LLM Council idea.
Want to see it in action first? Here’s the full LLM Council guide with the copy-paste version.
~/.claude/skills/ instead.