Claude's Hidden Tutor Mode (And 10 Prompts To Use With It)

Turn It On First (60 Seconds)

Open Claude (Claude.ai or the desktop app).
Click the mode selector right next to the message box.
Switch from Normal to Learn.

That’s it. Now any prompt below works. You can flip it back to Normal any time.

What Learning Mode Actually Does Differently

• Teaches, doesn’t tell. Asks you questions to make sure you understand instead of dumping the answer.
• Adjusts to you. If you’re moving fast, it goes deeper. If you’re struggling, it slows down and re-explains.
• Teaches from your stuff. Upload a contract, a 40-page report, or a pitch deck — Claude teaches that exact material, not generic theory.
• Quizzes you. Mini quizzes throughout so you can’t fake your way to the end.

Most people use Claude as a search engine. Learning Mode turns it into a tutor. Below are the 10 prompts that put it to work on real professional problems — not classroom-style learning, but the actual moments where you needed to understand something fast and didn’t.

How to use this guide: Pick a prompt. Switch to Learn mode. Upload the document if the prompt asks for one. Paste the prompt. Then actually engage when Claude asks you questions — that’s where the learning happens.

Run before any meetingUpload the doc first

Boss dropped a 40-page report on you. Meeting in 3 hours. Upload it, paste this, and walk in over-prepared. Claude teaches you the doc, quizzes you on what matters, and predicts what’ll come up.

Prompt 1 — Pre-Meeting Crammer

I just uploaded a document I have a meeting on in [HOURS] hours. I haven’t read it. Teach me what I need to know to walk into the meeting confident, not bluffing. Here’s how I want this to work: STEP 1: ORIENT ME Before teaching anything, tell me in 4 sentences: - What this document is (type, purpose, who wrote it) - Who the intended audience is - The 3 most important things in it - The 1-2 things that will most likely come up in my meeting STEP 2: WALK ME THROUGH IT Go section by section. For each section: - Explain the core point in plain English - Define any jargon, acronyms, or industry terms - Tell me how this section connects to the others - Ask me one comprehension question before moving on (don’t move until I answer correctly) STEP 3: QUIZ ME ON WHAT MATTERS After the walkthrough, hit me with 5 quiz questions covering: - The numbers I need to know cold - The decisions or recommendations the doc is pushing - The risks or open questions - Anything that would make me look unprepared if I missed it STEP 4: PREDICT THE MEETING Based on the doc, give me: - The 5 questions I’m most likely to be asked - A 2-sentence answer I can give to each - The 2-3 questions I should ask to look engaged and sharp - The thing the doc author probably wants the meeting to decide STEP 5: THE 60-SECOND CRIB SHEET End with a single block of text I can re-read on the way to the meeting: - 3 numbers - 3 names/terms - 1 question to ask - 1 thing to NOT bring up RULES - If I get a quiz question wrong, slow down and re-explain. Don’t move on until I get it right. - If the doc has 40+ pages, prioritize the 20% that will be in the meeting. Tell me what you’re skipping and why. - No filler. I’m on a clock. Tell me what document I uploaded and what I’m walking into. Then start with Step 1.

Use before signing anythingSurfaces what to negotiate

Upload a contract (employment, vendor, lease, NDA, partnership). Learning Mode walks you section by section, quizzes your understanding, and flags the clauses most people sign without reading.

Prompt 2 — Contract Decoder

I uploaded a contract I’m considering signing. Teach me what’s actually in it — section by section — and don’t let me move on from a section until I can explain it back to you in my own words. Here’s how I want this to work: STEP 1: ORIENT ME First, tell me: - What kind of contract this is - Who the parties are and who has the leverage - The 3 things this contract is really about (under the legal language) - The single biggest thing I should pay attention to STEP 2: WALK ME THROUGH IT Go section by section. For each section: - Translate the legal language into plain English - Explain WHY that clause exists (whose interest does it protect?) - Tell me what would happen in real life if it got triggered - Ask me a comprehension question, then wait for my answer - If I get it wrong or vague, re-explain a different way STEP 3: FLAG THE TRAPS After the walkthrough, give me a clear list of: - Standard clauses — normal, don’t worry - Negotiable clauses — usually softened with a simple ask - Red flags — things that should make me pause - Dealbreakers — clauses I should never sign as written For each flagged item, tell me what a good version of that clause looks like. STEP 4: TEACH ME THE NEGOTIATION OPENINGS For each negotiable item: - The exact ask (in one sentence I can email or say) - The reason that’s most likely to be accepted - The fallback if they say no - Whether it’s worth dying on this hill STEP 5: WHAT TO ASK A LAWYER End with: - The 3 specific questions I should ask a lawyer (not generic “is this fair” questions) - Whether anything in this contract is high-stakes enough to require a lawyer before signing RULES - This is informational, not legal advice. For anything significant, I’ll have a lawyer review. - Don’t hedge with “consult a professional” on every line. Teach me, then flag what genuinely needs legal review. - Quiz me on every section. I want to remember this in 30 days. Tell me what kind of contract I uploaded and who the parties are. Then start with Step 1.

Steal strategy legallyUse on any deck

Drop a pitch deck (yours, a competitor’s, a category leader’s). Don’t just summarize it — teach yourself the strategic logic. What they’re really saying. Where the bets are. What you can steal.

Prompt 3 — Pitch Deck Reverse-Engineer

I uploaded a pitch deck. Don’t summarize it. Teach me the strategy embedded in it — the moves the founders/team are making, what they’re really saying, where they’re hiding weakness, what I can steal. STEP 1: ORIENT ME In 4 sentences: - Whose deck this is and what they’re pitching (audience — investors, customers, partners?) - The single sentence that captures their thesis - The 2 strongest moves in this deck - The 1 thing they’re most worried about (read between the lines) STEP 2: WALK THE DECK STRATEGICALLY Go through the major slides in order. For each: - What that slide is doing strategically (positioning, de-risking, building belief, anchoring price, etc.) - What story they want to land in the reader’s head after this slide - What they left out and why - Ask me one question: “What do you think this slide is really trying to do?” — then teach me whether I read it right STEP 3: QUIZ MY READ OF THEIR STRATEGY Hit me with 5 questions: - What’s their go-to-market motion (founder-led, sales-led, PLG, partnership, channel)? - What’s their moat (data, brand, network effects, switching costs, regulatory)? - What’s their pricing model and what does it signal? - Who’s the real competitor they’re NOT naming on the competitive slide? - What’s the next 18 months of work for this team if the deck is true? STEP 4: THE COMPETITIVE LENS Now flip it: if I were a competitor, how would I attack this? - The weakest claim in the deck - The market segment they’re ignoring - The pricing/positioning move that would make them sweat - The thing about their team or product that doesn’t scale STEP 5: WHAT I CAN STEAL End with: - 3 specific moves I can borrow for my own deck/business/positioning - 1 storytelling pattern that worked in this deck - 1 thing they did that I should NOT copy (and why) RULES - Read between the lines. The strongest decks tell you more in what they don’t say. - If I get a quiz question wrong, explain how a strategist would have read it differently. - Don’t pull punches. The point is to learn, not to flatter the deck. Tell me whose deck I uploaded and who the audience appears to be. Then start with Step 1.

For non-academicsReplaces 3 hours of confusion

Upload an academic paper, whitepaper, or industry report. Learning Mode walks you abstract → methodology → findings → limitations, quizzing as you go. By the end you can actually cite it without overstating what it proves.

Prompt 4 — Research Paper Walkthrough

I uploaded a research paper / whitepaper / industry report. I’m smart but I’m not a specialist in this field. Teach me this paper at the level where I could explain it to a colleague and not get caught oversimplifying. STEP 1: THE 30-SECOND VERSION Before anything: in 4 sentences, tell me what this paper claims, why it matters, who’s arguing the opposite, and how confident I should be in the findings. STEP 2: WALK ME THROUGH IT Go in order: a. The question — what were they actually trying to find out? (Translated for me, not in academic-speak.) b. The methodology — how did they study it? Sample size, design, controls, limitations of the design itself. c. The findings — what did they actually find? Distinguish between “statistically significant but small” and “genuinely meaningful.” d. The limitations — what they themselves acknowledge can’t be concluded e. The implications — what changes in the real world if this is true After each part, ask me ONE comprehension question. Don’t move forward until I answer it. STEP 3: THE METHODOLOGY CRITIQUE Now teach me how to evaluate this: - What’s genuinely strong about how they studied it - What’s genuinely weak (sample, controls, time horizon, bias risk) - Which findings are likely to replicate vs. which are shakier - The 1-2 questions a peer reviewer would have asked STEP 4: HOW TO TALK ABOUT IT Teach me the right way to cite this: - The “safe” statement I can make based on what the paper actually shows - The overstatement I should avoid (the popular-press version) - A specific sentence I could use in a meeting/email/post STEP 5: THE QUIZ 5 questions: - What did they study and what did they NOT study? - What was the sample and why does it matter? - What’s the strongest finding? - What’s the weakest claim? - If someone says “This proves X,” how do you push back? STEP 6: WHAT TO READ NEXT End with: - 2-3 related papers, opposing views, or follow-ups worth knowing about - The one thing the field still hasn’t answered RULES - No academic-speak. If you use a term like “effect size” or “p-value,” explain it the first time. - Quiz me. If I get wrong answers, that’s where the real teaching happens. - Don’t flatter the paper. Be honest about what it does and doesn’t prove. Tell me what paper I uploaded and the field it’s in. Then start with Step 1.

Use for any skillAdjustable depth

The fast-track skill prompt. Pick anything — SQL, financial modeling, paid ads, basic Python, prompting, public speaking. Claude builds a 60-minute curriculum, paces you, quizzes you, and certifies you actually understand before letting you out.

Prompt 5 — Teach Me [Skill] in 60 Minutes

I want to learn [SKILL] in roughly 60 minutes. Build me a tight curriculum, pace me through it, quiz me at every step, and don’t let me certify out until I actually understand it. STEP 1: ASSESS MY STARTING POINT Before you build anything, ask me, one at a time: 1. What’s my current familiarity with this skill on a 1-10 scale, and what’s the most I’ve done with it? 2. What’s the SPECIFIC use case I need this for? (Not “I want to be good at it” — the actual situation I’m walking into.) 3. How much time do I really have today? (60 min? 30? Multiple sessions?) 4. Do I want to be functional, fluent, or expert by the end? STEP 2: BUILD THE CURRICULUM After my answers, output a curriculum: - 4-6 lessons, each with a 1-line learning objective - Estimated time per lesson - Why each lesson is in this order - The skills I’ll explicitly NOT cover today (and why I don’t need them yet) Wait for me to confirm before starting. STEP 3: TEACH IT, LESSON BY LESSON For each lesson: - Concept — the core idea in plain English - Demo — a worked example - Your turn — give me a problem to solve before moving on - Quiz — one short check question - Don’t move to the next lesson until I get the quiz right STEP 4: THE FINAL EXAM After all the lessons, give me 5 real-world problems that test the full skill: - A “basic” one (should feel easy) - 2 medium ones (the actual use case I told you about) - 1 edge case (test if I really understand) - 1 “explain it back to me” question (where I have to teach it back to you in my own words) For each, grade my answer honestly. Tell me what I got right, what I missed, and whether I’d be able to do this on the job. STEP 5: THE GAP MAP End with: - What I now know - What I almost know but should practice this week - What I’d need to learn next to go from functional → fluent - 2-3 specific resources (free, ideally) to get there RULES - Pace me. If I’m getting things right fast, go deeper. If I’m struggling, slow down. - No theory dumps. Every concept needs a worked example and a problem for me to try. - Don’t pass me on a quiz I half-answered. Make me explain it. - I’d rather be functional in 30 min than think I’m fluent and not be. Start with Step 1.

Before any vendor/investor meeting30 min replaces hours of research

Before meeting with a public company — vendor, partner, customer, investor — upload their last earnings call transcript or 10-K excerpt. Learning Mode teaches you their business: revenue mix, growth story, risks, and what’s quietly true between the lines.

Prompt 6 — Earnings Call / 10-K Decoder

I uploaded an earnings call transcript / 10-K / annual report for [COMPANY]. I have a meeting with someone from this company in [HOURS/DAYS]. Teach me their business at the level where I can hold an intelligent conversation with their team. STEP 1: THE BUSINESS IN ONE PARAGRAPH Before anything else, give me: - What this company actually does (in the words a customer would use, not the IR-speak version) - How they make money (the actual revenue lines) - Their stage (growing fast, maturing, defending, restructuring) - The single most important number on their balance sheet right now STEP 2: WALK ME THROUGH THE BUSINESS Teach me, section by section, with comprehension questions after each: a. Revenue mix — what segments, geographies, customer types? Which are growing, which are shrinking? b. Growth story — what’s management telling the market they’ll do over 18-24 months? c. Margin story — gross margins, operating margins, where leverage comes from d. Customer concentration — how diversified is the revenue? e. The risks — what’s in the risk factors that’s actually risk vs. boilerplate? f. The capital story — cash, debt, buybacks, dividends, M&A appetite Quiz me after each section. STEP 3: WHAT’S QUIETLY TRUE Now teach me the between-the-lines stuff: - What management is being careful NOT to say - The narrative they’re trying to install in analysts’ heads - The metric they’ve started reporting (or stopped reporting) and why - The competitor they keep mentioning vs. the one they refuse to name - The questions analysts are asking that suggest skepticism STEP 4: THE QUIZ Hit me with 5 questions any insider would expect a vendor/partner/investor to know: - What’s their fastest-growing segment and why? - What’s the biggest disappointment in this period? - What’s the bull case for the next 12 months? - What’s the bear case? - What’s management’s top priority right now? STEP 5: WHAT TO DO IN MY MEETING End with: - 3 questions I can ask that will signal I’ve done my homework - 2 topics to AVOID bringing up (sensitive) - 1 angle for how my product/service connects to their stated priority - The vocabulary/framing they use internally that I should mirror RULES - Stay close to what the document actually says. Flag any inference clearly. - If you don’t know something specific, say so — don’t fabricate numbers. - Quiz me. The point is for me to remember, not to nod along. Tell me what document I uploaded and what type of meeting I have. Then start with Step 1.

For job switchers30-day plan included

Switching industries, roles, or functions? Tell Claude where you’re coming from and where you’re going. It builds the curriculum, sequences the lessons, quizzes you, and tells you what you can fake vs. what you must actually learn.

Prompt 7 — Industry Pivot Crash Course

I’m pivoting from [CURRENT ROLE/INDUSTRY] to [TARGET ROLE/INDUSTRY]. Teach me what I need to know to be functional in 30 days. STEP 1: ASSESS MY STARTING POINT Ask me, one at a time: 1. My current background (years, what I actually do day-to-day, what I’m known for) 2. The specific role/industry I’m moving into (level, function, what the role does) 3. My timeline (interview soon? Already accepted? Still exploring?) 4. What I already know about the new industry — even surface-level STEP 2: MAP THE TRANSFER After my answers, output: - What transfers automatically — skills/knowledge from my current world that count in the new one (use this to calm me down) - What needs translation — things I know but called by different names - What I have to learn — genuinely new - What I can fake long enough to learn on the job — vs. what I must know cold before day 1 STEP 3: BUILD THE 30-DAY CURRICULUM - Week 1: Foundations (the worldview, the vocabulary, the “why” behind how this industry operates) - Week 2: The mechanics (how the work actually gets done, the tools, the process) - Week 3: The players (companies, roles, conferences, podcasts, who’s who) - Week 4: Live application (real scenarios, role-plays, mock conversations) For each week, give me: - 2-3 concrete topics to learn - The 1-2 hours of focus that matters most - One real-world artifact to consume (a podcast, paper, doc, or video) STEP 4: THE LESSONS Walk me through Week 1 right now. For each topic: - The core concept in plain English - A worked example using my actual background as the hook - Quiz me before moving to the next concept STEP 5: THE VOCABULARY After Week 1, give me a vocabulary list of the 30-50 terms I’ll hear in the new world. For each: - The definition - The contexts I’ll hear it in - A “sound natural” sample sentence I can use Quiz me on 10 of them. STEP 6: THE FINAL EXAM End Week 1 with 5 scenarios I might face in the new role: - I describe how I’d respond - You critique like a hiring manager / colleague in the new world - Tell me whether I sound like I belong yet STEP 7: POSITIONING End with: - 2-3 angles for how I should pitch my background for this pivot (resume, interview, intro) - The 1-2 things I should STOP saying that mark me as an outsider RULES - Use my real background as the bridge. Don’t teach generically. - Quiz me hard. The whole point is to not get caught faking. - If I’m drifting toward jargon I don’t actually understand, call it. Start with Step 1.

For the thing you’ve been fakingNo moving on until you get it

Pick the one thing you’ve nodded along to in meetings for years — APIs, cap tables, attribution models, bond yields, whatever. Claude teaches it from zero and refuses to let you off the hook until you can explain it back cold.

Prompt 8 — Concept That Embarrasses You

I want to finally understand [CONCEPT]. I’ve been nodding along to it for too long. Teach me from zero, and don’t move on until I can explain it back to you in my own words. STEP 1: FIND MY FLOOR First, ask me 3 short questions to figure out exactly how much I actually know vs. what I’ve been pretending to know. Don’t let me bluff. After my answers, tell me honestly: where do we have to start? “You actually know X. You don’t know Y. We start at Y.’ STEP 2: THE FOUNDATIONAL EXPLAINER Teach me the concept in this order: - What problem it solves — the real-world thing that wouldn’t work without it - The core mechanism — how it actually works - One concrete example — walk through it step by step - The analogy that makes it click — tied to something I already know After each piece, ask me: “Can you tell me back what I just explained?” Don’t move on until my answer would convince a peer. STEP 3: THE COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS Tell me the 3 things people commonly get wrong about this concept — and which ones I’m at risk of getting wrong based on what I told you in Step 1. Quiz me on each. STEP 4: WHERE I’LL SEE IT IN MY WORK Give me 3-5 specific places this concept shows up in real professional life: - In meetings - In documents - In decisions I’ll be asked to make - In conversations with [adjacent role] For each, what does it look like in the wild and what should I do/say? STEP 5: THE FINAL TEST 3 escalating challenges: 1. Explain the concept in 60 seconds, like you’re telling a smart friend 2. Apply it to a specific real-world scenario I describe 3. Catch a misuse of the concept — I’ll give you a wrong statement, you tell me what’s wrong with it Grade me honestly. Would a professional in this field accept my explanation? STEP 6: THE GAP End with: - What I now actually understand (not just “know about”) - What I’m still shaky on - The 1-2 next concepts that would deepen this further - A 30-second refresher I can come back to in 6 months RULES - I’m an adult. Don’t baby-talk me. But also don’t use jargon to teach me a thing I don’t know yet. - If I half-answer a quiz, push back. Don’t accept “something like X.” - The goal is not that I’ve heard of it. The goal is I can teach it to someone else next week. Start with Step 1.

For docs in any languageTeaches you the language too

Upload an email, contract, or document in a language you don’t speak. Learning Mode translates, teaches you what it actually means in context, and quizzes you on the vocab so the next one is easier.

Prompt 9 — Foreign Language Document

I uploaded a document in [LANGUAGE] that I need to understand and probably respond to. I don’t speak this language well (level: [NONE / BEGINNER / INTERMEDIATE]). Teach me what it says, what it means, and the language I need to handle the next one. STEP 1: THE TRANSLATION First give me: - A natural English translation (how a native speaker would say it in English) - A literal/word-for-word translation underneath where they differ meaningfully (so I see how the language structures things differently) STEP 2: WHAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS Translation is not enough. Teach me the meaning: - The intent behind the message (request, demand, formality, urgency, complaint) - The cultural/contextual nuance (is this formal? aggressive? polite? routine?) - What the sender is really asking for vs. what they wrote literally - What kind of response is expected (formal, quick, no response needed?) STEP 3: WALK ME THROUGH IT Go section by section / paragraph by paragraph: - Highlight 3-5 key phrases per section in the original language - Translate each - Tell me when I’d use this phrase in real life - Ask me to recognize it back when you show it again STEP 4: THE KEY VOCAB Pull 10-15 words/phrases from this document that I’ll see in similar documents in the future. For each: - The original word/phrase - The pronunciation hint - The English meaning - A sample sentence I could use myself Quiz me on 5 of them. Show me a new sentence with the word in it — can I figure out what’s being said? STEP 5: HOW TO RESPOND If a response is expected: - Draft a polite, level-appropriate response in [LANGUAGE] - Translate each sentence back to English - Walk me through why each phrase is correct for the level of formality required - Then have me try writing one myself, and you correct it STEP 6: THE NEXT TIME End with: - The 3-5 patterns I’ll see again in similar documents - A short cheat sheet of formal phrases for this kind of correspondence - One mistake non-native speakers commonly make in this context that I should avoid RULES - Don’t skip the translation step even if I claim I understand. Show me the literal vs. natural difference. - Quiz me on vocabulary. Just translating once won’t make it stick. - Keep responses culturally appropriate. Tone in the original language is half the meaning. Tell me what document I uploaded and what language it’s in. Then start with Step 1.

Think like a [role]Use before stepping into a new role

“Teach me to think like a [CFO / general counsel / data scientist / strategist / VC].” Claude walks the frameworks they actually use, role-plays them on real scenarios, and quizzes you until your reasoning matches the expert default.

Prompt 10 — Mental Model Builder

Teach me to think like a [ROLE]. Not the surface-level version — the actual frameworks, instincts, and language that make a great one different from the rest. STEP 1: THE WORLDVIEW Before any frameworks, teach me: - What a great [ROLE] cares about most (the 3-4 things that drive every decision) - What they actively ignore (and why — because the worst version of this role gets distracted by it) - What they fear (the failure modes that keep them up at night) - The single sentence that captures their job in plain English Ask me to repeat it back in my own words. Correct me if I’m off. STEP 2: THE FRAMEWORKS Teach me the 3-5 mental models or frameworks a great [ROLE] defaults to. For each: - The framework itself (named, in plain English) - The kind of problem it’s used for - A worked example using a real scenario - How it differs from how a non-[ROLE] would approach the same problem After each framework, give me a small problem to apply it to. Then critique my answer. STEP 3: THE LANGUAGE Teach me the language a [ROLE] uses: - 10-15 phrases/terms they say constantly that signal expertise - 5 phrases an outsider would use that immediately mark them as not [ROLE] - The questions a [ROLE] asks first when handed a new problem Quiz me: I give you a take, you tell me whether it sounds like [ROLE] or like an outsider trying to sound like [ROLE]. STEP 4: PRACTICE SCENARIOS Give me 4 realistic scenarios a [ROLE] would face: - I describe my reasoning and what I’d do - You walk through what a great [ROLE] would actually do - Tell me what I missed and why — and which framework I should have reached for Make at least one scenario hard. The teaching happens when I get it wrong. STEP 5: THE FINAL EXAM A single complex scenario, with multiple judgment calls. I make my decisions one at a time. After each, you tell me how a great [ROLE] would have decided, and what the difference reveals about the way I’m still thinking. STEP 6: THE RED FLAGS End with: - 3-5 signals that I’m reverting to my old way of thinking instead of [ROLE]’s - A question I can ask myself before any decision to check whether I’m in the right mindset - The 1 book / podcast / writer that would deepen this thinking the most RULES - Don’t flatter me. The point is to expose the gap, not pretend I’m already there. - Use specific examples. “A CFO would think about cost of capital” is fine; show me how they’d apply it to a real decision. - Quiz aggressively. Push back when I’m being lazy. Start with Step 1.

If you only run one of these, make it Prompt 1 (The Pre-Meeting Crammer). The next time your boss drops a doc on you with “let’s discuss this tomorrow,” you’ll walk in over-prepared instead of skimming on the train.

After that, layer in Prompt 5 for the one skill you’ve been meaning to learn for two years and Prompt 8 for the concept you’ve quietly been faking. Three prompts, three weekends, three permanent upgrades to how you work.

Most people use Claude as a search engine. Learning Mode is what turns it into a tutor — and the difference is what you remember 30 days later.

For Your Job

Set Up Claude for Your Specific Job

If you’re ready to set up Claude for your specific job — with custom skills, connectors, and automations built around the work you do every day — I built a bootcamp just for you.

Start the Weekend Bootcamp →

Go Even Further

Join the AI Income Lab

If you’re looking to go even further, join mine and my husband’s community group where we give you all the AI agents and systems running our businesses.

Join the Community →

Claude's HiddenTutor Mode(+ 10 Prompts)

Set Up Claude for Your Specific Job

Join the AI Income Lab

Claude's Hidden
Tutor Mode
(+ 10 Prompts)